News About Turkey | NAT

Democratic Confederalism: End of the Nation-State or Turkish-Led Integration under Confederation?

A new and important chapter in Kurdish politics has begun with the PKK's official disbandment after Abdullah Öcalan called for peace and a democratic society. This change isn't only about stopping the fighting; it's also about changing what power, identity, and statehood mean in the 21st century. The idea of "positive integration" and the use of Öcalan's model of democratic confederalism are at the heart of this change. This is a radical alternative to the nation-state that aims to organize society from the bottom up, based on autonomy, pluralism, ecological sustainability, and gender equality (Jongerden, 2019).The PKK congress that took place from May 5 to 7, 2025, after Öcalan's clear call for disbandment and disarmament, was a crucial part of this change. But there is still a lot of talk about what this step means, especially for Syria. Öcalan told the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) that they do not seek a state and instead want a united, democratic Syria. Some reports claim that Öcalan has seen the peace process in Turkey as part of a larger change in the area and has kept in touch with high-ranking PYD/YPG/SDF leaders in Rojava. The appeal for unification is not about constructing a state, but about strengthening democratic systems across borders based on self-governance and local involvement.Öcalan's idea of "democratic integration" was explained in his 160-page Manifesto for Peace and Democratic Society. He said, "Integration means the unity of democratic society with the nation-state... also means equality." It is set up through negotiations that are open to everyone. Öcalan uses the word "society" to mean Kurds, and he tells them to integrate not by becoming a state, but by using democratic means in Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and Iran. He says that the future rests in changing these nation-states from the inside out instead of trying to break free from them.Before the congress, Öcalan is said to have delivered a message to the leaders of the PYD and SDF that said, "In this new time, there is no place for a state." We want Syria to be a unified democracy. The PYD needs to focus on making itself stronger inside local democracy based on the values we talked about. He also said that a democratic Syria would make armaments useless: "Weapons mean enmity." "Hostility will also go away when weapons are taken away."This way of phrasing things shows that Öcalan is moving away from statist socialism and toward a model that is more in line with communalist and anarchist ideas. Öcalan's idea of revolution is different from the classical revolutions of the 20th century, which tried to take over or change the government. Instead, he sees revolution as a way to rebuild society. It goes beyond the Marxist-Leninist idea of hierarchical control and into a networked, community system where authority is spread out instead of concentrated (Gürbey, Hofmann & Ibrahim Seyder, 2017; Törnquist, 2013). In this view, the state is no longer the end objective or container of freedom; it is only one player in a pluralistic democratic ecology.The principle of constructive integration is at the heart of this new vision. Öcalan says that instead of separatist nationalism or becoming part of the dominant state structures, Kurds and other oppressed groups should work together to change the political system while keeping their identities. Positive integration is about living together peacefully through democratic negotiation, not giving in (Gök, 2020). It gives us a way to change the nation-state from the inside out without copying its authoritarian roots.There are examples around the world that illustrate that this kind of framework can work. For example, Quebec has cultural autonomy inside Canada, Bolivia has a plurinational state model under Evo Morales, and Scotland is semi-sovereign in the UK (Bebbington et al., 2018). In these circumstances, identity is not erased; it is kept and become stronger. Rojava, the autonomous Kurdish-led territory in northern Syria, is probably the best example of democratic confederalism in action. It is being practiced through local assemblies, gender co-leadership, and grassroots government (Dirik, 2016; Knapp, Flach & Ayboga, 2016). In that place, stateless democracy isn't just a theory; it's a genuine thing.Anarchist philosophy has always come up with radical ways to replace centralized power structures and systems of coercion (Marshall, 2008; Kinna, 2009). It comes from an intellectual lineage that is against the state and very critical of hierarchy and authority. Abdullah Öcalan's ideas of "democratic nation" and "democratic confederalism" have been more popular in anarchist writing in recent years. Öcalan's criticisms of the state, power, hierarchy, and the relationship between humans and environment have grown in scope, especially because of the ideas of Murray Bookchin (Biehl, 2015; Bookchin, 2005).The arguments between Mikhail Bakunin and Karl Marx in the 19th century show how different anarchist and Marxist ideas are. Marx and Bakunin both criticized capitalist exploitation, but Marx pushed for a proletarian-led state as a necessary step toward a better society. Bakunin, on the other hand, said that any kind of state, including a workers' state, would lead to further domination (Bakunin, 1972; Graham, 2005). Bakunin was against centralism and vanguardism and instead supported direct participation through local assemblies. In 1872, Bakunin was kicked out of the First International because of the historical split. Marx's theories led to Soviet-style socialism, while Bakunin's ideals lingered on in anarchist and direct-action movements.Öcalan, who has called the state "one of the most dangerous inventions in human history," sees the idea of a stateless democracy as a return to that 19th-century discussion in the modern Middle East. Since 2012, Rojava has built self-governing organizations such communes, assemblies, women's councils, and defence groups. These are examples of Bakunin's vision of a stateless society (Knapp et al., 2016; Leezenberg, 2016). Öcalan doesn't directly mention Bakunin, but his model brings back the spirit of the suppressed anarchist movement. It offers a decentralized and pluralistic alternative to the colonial and authoritarian governmental institutions that are common in the area.This new way of thinking places women at the centre, which is very important.…